Had custody of my grandkids and plenty of space and she awarded them to someone else. Now I'm back to again to deal with the same person again for the same thing.
Review Left On 12/01/2019
Doni Lazenby
Mr. Amole is kind and knowledgeable.
Review Left On 08/01/2019
Brittany May
I had the misfortune of being court appointed Mrs. Bray as GAL after my abusive ex husband filed for custody. In speaking with her over the course of a handful of visits I shared with her the abuse that occurred leading up to and throughout our marriage that had landed him in the monitored visitation he currently had. I explained my concerns as to why it was necessary to keep my child safe. Mrs. Bray was provided texts, transcripts of audio recordings, and audio recordings where my ex-husband apologized for multiple instances of physical abuse; including an altercation in which he sent me to the ER while I was seven months pregnant with our child. Mrs. Bray characterized this information in a way that was not only very unsettling to my husband and I, but her clear lack of domestic violence knowledge and how cases need to be handled for the safety of the children was alarming. She even handed over private information to my ex despite it having being protected from the previous court's rulings.
In her final report, Mrs. Bray asserted that I “began a narrative” during our second meeting outlining the abuse. In our final meeting (which I recorded), I asked her to listen to the audio recordings I had as evidence. Mrs. Bray assured me that she had already reviewed all of the text, and audio evidence I had sent her. However, one week later when the recordings were addressed in court, Mrs. Bray stood up during the proceedings and stated that she had never heard such audio recordings. She twisted or completely fabricated so many things that I had said during our meetings and recommended that my daughter (who I have had sole custody of her whole life) be given immediately to my abusive ex to Iive with. Thank god the judge reviewed the evidence during trial and threw out her bogus recommendations. It is disgusting that people like her are allowed to handle domestic abuse cases when she has no skill to do so. I have since found many other lives she has ruined and children she has thrown in direct harms way due to her arrogance and ignorance. If you are unfortunate enough to be assigned to her, I recommend you record all interactions and have the best lawyer possible. Her motives are unknown but undeniably dangerous.
For “more than 30 years, the law firm of Amole & Bray P.C. and its predecessor firm have provided reliable legal service to the people of Northern Virginia”, and here I have the honor of the first Google review…
I can speak only to the observed performance of Mrs. Bray while she served as guardian ad litem for my stepdaughter after a motion by her biological father to modify custody/visitation.
For whatever reason, Mrs. Bray seemed to take an immediate disliking to my wife (a work from home entrepreneur) and I (an active duty Army Officer). Following our first two engagements with her, my wife and I felt that we were being so mischaracterized we elected to tape-record future exchanges. Thank god we did. Upon receiving Mrs. Bray’s official report, our counsel was able to file a motion to dismiss given what we believed was a clear bias contained throughout. Unfortunately, the motion was not approved, but our efforts did highlight our concerns to the court with respect to the ‘demonstrably false representations’ (language taken from the motion) of my wife and I by Mrs. Bray. One such instance follows.
In the motion filed by our representation, we highlighted Mrs. Bray’s account of an arrangement for a follow-up meeting with my wife where Mrs. Bray stated: “When I asked Mother two months later if I could return to her home because I had further questions and concerns, she refused to allow me to visit the home. When I asked her why, her tone was hostile and she said, “Because I don’t want to. Instead we met at Starbucks for our final meeting.”
Mrs. Bray’s description of my wife above alleged her to be hostile, and obstructionist. In reality, and omitted from the description of the coordination to set up the meeting, Mrs. Bray left the following voicemail for my wife where she stated the following: “Hi Ms. XXXXX, this is [Mrs. Bray] calling. I haven’t talked to you in a while. I would like to touch base with you again and see if there’s any loose ends that we need to wrap up, see if there’s any information that you want to give me. I would also just like to chat with you, I have a couple more questions. I’d be happy to meet you. If you want to meet at a Starbuck’s that’s fine, if you want me to drop by your place one time maybe when [Stepdaughter] is in school, I think she’s in school two days a week, is what you said – but if you could just let me know that would be great, and you can call on my cell phone or the office. You have the cell, the office is [office number]. Thanks a lot, bye-bye."
This single instance is representative of multiple others that were caught on tape. In the end, the judge opted NOT to take the GAL’s recommendations, and my wife was able to retain sole legal, and physical custody. I expect this was due in no small part to Mrs. Bray’s outright dismissal of my wife’s allegations of abuse by her ex-husband.
This is a woman who I believe came to an initial judgement, and stuck with it to the bitter end, casting aside any evidence unsupportive of her preliminary conclusion. Everyone makes mistakes, but she appeared unwilling to even entertain the possibility that she had miscalculated from the start. My wife (I was a witness and could not be present during the hearing) characterized Mrs. Bray’s behavior during the proceeding as someone much more concerned with defending her report to the court than of a GAL looking out for the best interests of her child. Given these concerns we intend to file a complaint with the Virginia State Bar.
I cannot fathom how Mrs. Bray has been able to remain in the legal profession for so long given my experience with her. Upon looking into her further, I found a case involving a Mrs. Natalia Dalton in 2018 (worth the read), in which Mrs. Dalton seem to have experienced many of the same issues noted above. I do hope upon reading this review Debra will consider retirement. For anyone that finds themselves in a position where they are forced to work with Mrs. Bray, I highly recommend recording, and keeping a record of all interactions for your own protection.
best law office Reviews
In her final report, Mrs. Bray asserted that I “began a narrative” during our second meeting outlining the abuse. In our final meeting (which I recorded), I asked her to listen to the audio recordings I had as evidence. Mrs. Bray assured me that she had already reviewed all of the text, and audio evidence I had sent her. However, one week later when the recordings were addressed in court, Mrs. Bray stood up during the proceedings and stated that she had never heard such audio recordings. She twisted or completely fabricated so many things that I had said during our meetings and recommended that my daughter (who I have had sole custody of her whole life) be given immediately to my abusive ex to Iive with. Thank god the judge reviewed the evidence during trial and threw out her bogus recommendations. It is disgusting that people like her are allowed to handle domestic abuse cases when she has no skill to do so. I have since found many other lives she has ruined and children she has thrown in direct harms way due to her arrogance and ignorance. If you are unfortunate enough to be assigned to her, I recommend you record all interactions and have the best lawyer possible. Her motives are unknown but undeniably dangerous.
I can speak only to the observed performance of Mrs. Bray while she served as guardian ad litem for my stepdaughter after a motion by her biological father to modify custody/visitation.
For whatever reason, Mrs. Bray seemed to take an immediate disliking to my wife (a work from home entrepreneur) and I (an active duty Army Officer). Following our first two engagements with her, my wife and I felt that we were being so mischaracterized we elected to tape-record future exchanges. Thank god we did. Upon receiving Mrs. Bray’s official report, our counsel was able to file a motion to dismiss given what we believed was a clear bias contained throughout. Unfortunately, the motion was not approved, but our efforts did highlight our concerns to the court with respect to the ‘demonstrably false representations’ (language taken from the motion) of my wife and I by Mrs. Bray. One such instance follows.
In the motion filed by our representation, we highlighted Mrs. Bray’s account of an arrangement for a follow-up meeting with my wife where Mrs. Bray stated:
“When I asked Mother two months later if I could return to her home because I had further questions and concerns, she refused to allow me to visit the home. When I asked her why, her tone was hostile and she said, “Because I don’t want to. Instead we met at Starbucks for our final meeting.”
Mrs. Bray’s description of my wife above alleged her to be hostile, and obstructionist. In reality, and omitted from the description of the coordination to set up the meeting, Mrs. Bray left the following voicemail for my wife where she stated the following:
“Hi Ms. XXXXX, this is [Mrs. Bray] calling. I haven’t talked to you in a while. I would like to touch base with you again and see if there’s any loose ends that we need to wrap up, see if there’s any information that you want to give me. I would also just like to chat with you, I have a couple more questions. I’d be happy to meet you. If you want to meet at a Starbuck’s that’s fine, if you want me to drop by your place one time maybe when [Stepdaughter] is in school, I think she’s in school two days a week, is what you said – but if you could just let me know that would be great, and you can call on my cell phone or the office. You have the cell, the office is [office number]. Thanks a lot, bye-bye."
This single instance is representative of multiple others that were caught on tape. In the end, the judge opted NOT to take the GAL’s recommendations, and my wife was able to retain sole legal, and physical custody. I expect this was due in no small part to Mrs. Bray’s outright dismissal of my wife’s allegations of abuse by her ex-husband.
This is a woman who I believe came to an initial judgement, and stuck with it to the bitter end, casting aside any evidence unsupportive of her preliminary conclusion. Everyone makes mistakes, but she appeared unwilling to even entertain the possibility that she had miscalculated from the start. My wife (I was a witness and could not be present during the hearing) characterized Mrs. Bray’s behavior during the proceeding as someone much more concerned with defending her report to the court than of a GAL looking out for the best interests of her child. Given these concerns we intend to file a complaint with the Virginia State Bar.
I cannot fathom how Mrs. Bray has been able to remain in the legal profession for so long given my experience with her. Upon looking into her further, I found a case involving a Mrs. Natalia Dalton in 2018 (worth the read), in which Mrs. Dalton seem to have experienced many of the same issues noted above. I do hope upon reading this review Debra will consider retirement. For anyone that finds themselves in a position where they are forced to work with Mrs. Bray, I highly recommend recording, and keeping a record of all interactions for your own protection.